← All Connections
Manic

If You Like Manic(2017)

Based on real preference data from thousands of voters, here's what fans of Manic also love.

57 connections found

57 connections
Sort by
The Tracey Fragments#1137x

The Tracey Fragments

2008
58 voters
Thumbsucker#281x

Thumbsucker

2005
56 voters
Mysterious Skin#379x

Mysterious Skin

2005
Sci-Fi
110 voters
Prozac Nation#478x

Prozac Nation

2003
63 voters
Running with Scissors#577x

Running with Scissors

2006
61 voters
White Oleander#662x

White Oleander

2002
Thriller
50 voters
Sunshine Cleaning#756x

Sunshine Cleaning

2009
Thriller
57 voters
Brick#850x

Brick

2006
Thriller
69 voters
Saved!#946x

Saved!

2004
54 voters
Jawbreaker#1042x

Jawbreaker

1999
56 voters
Thirteen#1139x

Thirteen

2003
Thriller
78 voters
Kids#1239x

Kids

1995
66 voters
Youth in Revolt#1337x

Youth in Revolt

2010
57 voters
Charlie Bartlett#1436x

Charlie Bartlett

2008
63 voters
Hard Candy#1534x

Hard Candy

2006
91 voters
Ghost World#1629x

Ghost World

2001
80 voters
Adventureland#1728x

Adventureland

2009
71 voters
#1825x

Kimaat Mefursemet

2017
Drama
64 voters
Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist#1922x

Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist

2008
60 voters
Garden State#2022x

Garden State

2004
74 voters
Heathers#2119x

Heathers

1989
58 voters
It's Kind of a Funny Story#2218x

It's Kind of a Funny Story

2010
Action
51 voters
Rushmore#2318x

Rushmore

1999
52 voters
The Darjeeling Limited#2418x

The Darjeeling Limited

2007
57 voters
Thank You for Smoking#2518x

Thank You for Smoking

2006
Comedy
53 voters
The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou#2617x

The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou

2004
Fantasy
54 voters
The Royal Tenenbaums#2713x

The Royal Tenenbaums

2002
67 voters
The Machinist#2812x

The Machinist

2004
62 voters
Little Miss Sunshine#2910x

Little Miss Sunshine

2006
79 voters
Being John Malkovich#3010x

Being John Malkovich

1999
58 voters
Juno#319.8x

Juno

2007
75 voters
Lost in Translation#329.7x

Lost in Translation

2003
54 voters
Requiem for a Dream#339.3x

Requiem for a Dream

2000
96 voters
(500) Days of Summer#349.2x

(500) Days of Summer

2009
ComedyRomance
70 voters
Trainspotting#357.9x

Trainspotting

1996
73 voters
American Psycho#367.8x

American Psycho

2000
75 voters
Edward Scissorhands#377.7x

Edward Scissorhands

1990
69 voters
Donnie Darko#387.6x

Donnie Darko

2001
Thriller
102 voters
The Butterfly Effect#397.6x

The Butterfly Effect

2004
51 voters
Sin City#407.3x

Sin City

2005
51 voters
The Shining#416.7x

The Shining

1980
67 voters
The Perks of Being a Wallflower#426.7x

The Perks of Being a Wallflower

2012
52 voters
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind#436.6x

Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind

2004
98 voters
Scott Pilgrim vs. the World#446.6x

Scott Pilgrim vs. the World

2010
Fantasy
56 voters
Zombieland#456.4x

Zombieland

2009
Horror
54 voters
American History X#466.2x

American History X

1998
67 voters
The Breakfast Club#476.1x

The Breakfast Club

1985
50 voters
Reservoir Dogs#486.0x

Reservoir Dogs

1992
71 voters
The Truman Show#494.7x

The Truman Show

1998
73 voters
The Silence of the Lambs#504.4x

The Silence of the Lambs

1991
Thriller
58 voters
Pulp Fiction#514.4x

Pulp Fiction

1994
89 voters
V for Vendetta#524.2x

V for Vendetta

2006
Action
55 voters
Inglourious Basterds#534.0x

Inglourious Basterds

2009
Action
57 voters
Fight Club#543.8x

Fight Club

1999
Action
91 voters
The Dark Knight#553.0x

The Dark Knight

2008
Action
51 voters
The Matrix#562.8x

The Matrix

1999
52 voters
Inception#572.5x

Inception

2010
59 voters

How does this work?

These recommendations are based on real voting data, not algorithms. When thousands of people vote on their favorites, patterns emerge — people who love Manic consistently tend to also love certain other things. The "strength" score shows how much more likely fans of Manic are to enjoy each recommendation compared to the average person.

Unlike algorithmic recommendations, these connections come from actual human preferences. A high strength score means the connection is genuine — not just because two items share a category, but because the same people genuinely love both.