Philosophy

Logical Fallacies — Argument Killers

Logical Fallacies — Argument Killers is a structured philosophy dataset with 15 entries. Its fields include Fallacy, Latin Name, Category. Community voting appears as a separate signal beside eligible rows and does not replace the source values.

Every row is shown below and is also available as CSV, JSON, or Excel.

15rows
5columns
77views
0downloads
Source:Community curated
Updated:3/6/2026

Dataset details

Table scope
All 15 rows
Fields
5 columns
Source
Community curated
Data updated
Mar 6, 2026

Included fields: Fallacy, Latin Name, Category, Example, Why It's Wrong.

The table contains every record in this dataset; the same records are available in each download format.

Preview observations

Latin Name groups
10 distinct values
Across 15 preview rows
Category groups
4 distinct values
Across 15 preview rows

Useful for

  • Comparing Fallacy, Latin Name, and Category across philosophy entries
  • Building reference tables, charts, or analyses from 15 downloadable records
15/15
Fallacy
Latin Name
Category
Example
Why It's Wrong
Straw Man
Ignoratio ElenchiInformal'You want gun control? So you want to ban all guns and leave people defenseless!'Misrepresents the opponent's argument to make it easier to attack
Ad Hominem
Argumentum ad HominemInformal'You can't trust his climate research — he drives an SUV'Attacks the person instead of their argument — character doesn't determine truth
Appeal to Authority
Argumentum ad VerecundiamInformal'This celebrity endorses this diet, so it must work'Being an authority in one field doesn't make you right about everything
Slippery Slope
Informal'If we allow same-sex marriage, next people will marry animals'Assumes one step inevitably leads to extreme consequences without evidence
False Dilemma
BifurcationInformal'You're either with us or against us'Presents only two options when more exist — reality is rarely binary
Red Herring
Ignoratio ElenchiInformal'Why worry about climate change when there are children starving?'Introduces an irrelevant topic to divert attention from the real argument
Circular Reasoning
Petitio PrincipiiFormal'The Bible is true because God wrote it, and God exists because the Bible says so'The conclusion is assumed in the premise — proves nothing
Bandwagon
Argumentum ad PopulumInformal'Everyone is investing in crypto, so it must be a good investment'Popularity doesn't equal truth — millions of people can be wrong simultaneously
Appeal to Nature
Informal'It's natural, so it must be good for you'Arsenic is natural. Smallpox is natural. Natural ≠ good.
Tu Quoque
Tu QuoqueInformal'You smoke but tell me to quit? Hypocrite!'Someone being a hypocrite doesn't make their advice wrong
Gambler's Fallacy
Probabilistic'Red has come up 5 times in a row, black is due!'Past random events don't influence future random events — the roulette wheel has no memory
No True Scotsman
Informal'No real programmer uses tabs' / 'Well, they're not a real programmer then'Redefines the group to exclude counterexamples instead of updating the claim
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Post HocInformal'I wore my lucky socks and we won, so the socks caused the win'Correlation ≠ causation — sequence doesn't prove cause
Burden of Proof Shift
Onus ProbandiInformal'Prove that aliens DON'T exist!'The person making the claim must provide evidence, not the skeptic
Sunk Cost Fallacy
Cognitive Bias'I've watched 6 seasons, I have to finish even though it's terrible'Past investment shouldn't dictate future decisions — only future value matters

Free to explore · No signup needed

Loading community rankings...